Don't count on it. They still haven't removed the collision count on show int serial after all these yeas! ;-)
Priscilla At 06:10 PM 12/18/01, MADMAN wrote: >Or more generally remote access!!!! > > Thought I would pass a tid bit of info I garned after beating my head >and wasting time needlessly in the hopes someone else doesn't replicate >same. > > Got a call from a customer, an ISP, wondering why his users with V.92 >modems were always connecting at V.90. I quickly educated myself on >Ciscos support for V.92 and verified the 5300's were up to spec. I >found a V.92 modem laying, lying around and called it myself, the sh >modem x/x showed V.90. I found on CCO a test number for V.92 calls and >called this 5300 in San Jose, same result. I set up a 5300 in our lab >with a PRI, same result. Read docs thinkng I was missing something, >didn't seem to be, opened case with TAC. > > Talked to engineer, he didn't know why either. Got a DE and about a >day later found out that even when you make a V.92 connection the 5300 >will display V.90!!!!!!!! The answer was "you need to try a V.92 >feature". The V.92 feature is modem on hold. > > I calmly suggested that they may want to take two minute and two lines >of code and add V.92 as a connection type!! > > >-- >David Madland >Sr. Network Engineer >CCIE# 2016 >Qwest Communications Int. Inc. >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >612-664-3367 > >"Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" ________________________ Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29551&t=29545 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
