>I need an internet gateway router (via DSL connected to a Flowpoint) which >currently has a static route to the ISP to know when the netowrk goes down >and not just that flowpoint's local ethernet interface. I need the gateway >router to dial up via isdn using dialer-watch. I'd rathernot use BGP on >this router, and was wondering if it's even common practice to use OSPF to >the ISP. They might say no.
What is your objection to running BGP? If BGP is only receiving the default and advertising your prefixes, the resource requirements are trivial. > >Would creating a NSSA work? Even a totally stub area might work? > >Once Cisco releases DHRP, I'll be all set. > > > > >""John Neiberger"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> Could you solve the same problem by creating a static default route on >> the ASBR and then redistributing that as an N1 or N2 route? That seems >> to do what you want without requiring that OSPF be running between the >> ASBR and the ISP. >> >> This wouldn't be dynamic, which may be what you're trying to >> accomplish. If so, it seems that it would be more likely that they >> could set up a BGP session with you using a private ASN and then they >> could dynamically inject a default into your ASBR. >> >> Would that work in your situation? >> >> Regards, >> John >> >> >>> "Steven A. Ridder" 12/19/01 1:31:28 PM >>> >> Is it feasable to have an ISP set up an OSPF routing area with it's >> customer, and have them inject a single external route into the area, >> where >> one can distribute it as a default route? If I create a NSSA, and they >> give >> us a route to them, is that OK? Any downfalls? >> >> Steve Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29699&t=29686 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
