There was fairly recently a long thread on this. I think you know what a static route is so lets assume you meant static default route. Most routing protocols understand the 0.0.0.0 to be the psuedo default route. But IGRP does not, you must flag a network as the default network using the default-network command. I think what Caslow is refering to is that if you flag 192.168.1.0 as your default network you must have a route to that network in your routing table.
Dave Hunt Lee wrote: > > Can someone please explain to me what's the difference between a static > route & ip default-network? I have always been thinking that default-network > is similar to static routes - gateway of last resort. That is, when the > router doesn't know how to forward the route, it will send it to "default > network" (as compared to a single destination specified by static route). > > I read up the Ip default-network on Caslow (on p352 - about configuring > default routes for IGRP), it states that whatever network you reference with > "ip default-network" statement must be in the routing table of the router > that is sourcing the default-network or must be advertised by the > originating router as a classful prefix. > > Which makes me even more confused.... > > Any help is greatly appreciated. > > Hunt Lee > IP Solution Analyst > Cable & Wireless -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29903&t=29895 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]