The Checkpoint/Nokia 330 runs IPSO as the OS on hardened freeBSD. These will
actually run routing protocols too, i.e.., RIP, OSPF, IGRP, etc.... Nice GUI
too...They do dominate their market segment.

Eric

----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Larrieu" 
To: 
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 1:50 PM
Subject: OT - Firewall performance Comparisons - is it quitting time
[7:30576]


> I sure love slow days like today. I've discovered a whole new section on
the
> company intranet - a group that does performance and acceptability testing
> for vendor equipment which we sell.
>
> So I'm looking over the firewall report - Cisco 515 versus several other
> things.
>
> I have never seen or heard this before, but according to this doc,
> Checkpoint on a Nokia 330 box outperformed the PIX 515 substantially. by
> about 20% in terms of throughput. I have always heard that PIX outperforms
> Checkpoint by a large margin. Maybe that was when compared to Checkpoint
on
> a Windoze box?
>
> Interesting to see in the results was that the Cisco 1601 with IP firewall
> feature set outperformed the Cisco 2610 by a decent ( but not
overwhelming )
> margin. The PIX 515 looks to be about 50% faster than the 1601 and twice
as
> fast as the 2610.
>
> The PIX 515  was about twice as fast, in terms of throughput, than the
$500
> Netscreen 5XP ( low end ) firewall
>
> Granted, the testbed was limited in that there were just a few stations on
> the inside trying to get to just a few stations on the outside. Traffic
> simulation was used for different types of traffic ( http, ftp, etc )
> Granted there are  other issues, such as scalability.
>
> Still, it sure looks to be an interesting year ahead, in the security
> products market.
>
> Happy New Year, everyone!
>
> Chuck




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30585&t=30585
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to