Thank you for all your input. This has helped me
a great deal.

David

----- Original Message -----
From: "Louie Belt" 
To: "CCIEn2002" 
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:53 PM
Subject: RE: Passive Interface Help [7:30648]


> A passive interface prevents a routing protocol from advertising its
routes
> via that interface.  If you had a loopback interface is there any need to
> advertise routes out of it?  No one would hear them - so why waste
processor
> cycles sending a routing update to an interface that has nothing else
> connected.
>
> However, that same passive interface has it's IP address (or network)
> advertised to all other interfaces - therefore it is pingable.
>
> Other uses for passive interfaces would be when redistributing routing
> protocols (especially between FLSM and VLSM routing protocols), or even to
> limit an advertisement to a unicast (single destination instead of a
> broadcast) - for instance an interface advertising RIP (v1) uses a
broadcast
> to make that advertisement out of each interface that is using RIP.  By
> setting an interface to passive and using a neighbor statement in the
> routing protocol you can force RIP to only advertise its routes to a
single
> unicast address instead of broadcasting it to every device on the IP
> network.
>
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Louie A Belt
> CCIE #7054
> Pomeroy Select Integration Systems
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> CCIEn2002
> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 1:01 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Passive Interface Help [7:30648]
>
>
> Thank you for the info. Now I am a little confused still on
> the passive interface. If it prevents routing updates
> from being sent out, why would one want a
> passive interface. From my understanding, a
> passive interface would not advertise is routing
> updates to its neighbor. If that is the case, I am perplexed
> on why I can ping a passive interface that is being advertised
> thru a routing protocol. In my case, my neighbor router
> is seeing an IGRP update for the Ethernet network.
>
> Why would you make the Ethernet passive if you can still
> ping it and see its routing update from a neighboring router
> via the show ip route ?
> This is where I get confused by the definition of passive.
>
> Any help..I am a rookie as you can see
>
> David
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "cheekin"
> To: ;
> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 4:43 AM
> Subject: Re: Passive Interface Help [7:30648]
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > When you make the ethernet interface passive, it means no igrp updates
> will
> > be sent out on the ethernet interface.  It doesn't stop the serial
> interface
> > from advertising network 12.0.0.0 .  Which explains why you can still
ping
> > to the ethernet interface.  If for some reason you do not want network
> > 12.0.0.0 to be advertised, remove the network 12.0.0.0 statement or use
> > distribute-list to filter out the route.
> >
> > Regards,
> > cheekin
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From:
> > To:
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 15:03
> > Subject: Passive Interface Help [7:30648]
> >
> >
> > > Happy New Year!!
> > >
> > > I need a little help on what a passive
> > > interface is. From what I can gather, a passive
> > > interface does not advertise its route to its
> > > neighbor ? Now if that is the case, why can
> > > I still ping an interface that is set to passive.
> > > Please note: This is excluding directly connected
> > > routes.
> > >
> > > For example, I set my Cisco 2509 ethernet interface
> > > to passive. Why can I still ping the ethernet address
> > > from my neighboring router Cisco 4000 ? I am
> > > running IGRP. Why does the ethernet network show up in its routing
table
> > for
> > > my Cisco 4000. From poking around with the passive interface command
it
> > > seems that I can not ping my ethernet address only if I set the Serial
> > > interfaces to passive also.
> > > This seems odd. I thought if I made an ethernet interface passive, I
> > should
> > > not be able to ping it from a neighboring router or any other router
> since
> > > it is not being
> > > advertised.
> > >
> > > Below is a sample of me being able to ping serial 1 off
> > > my Cisco 2509 from my Cisco 4000. Serial 1 is "not"
> > > directly connected. Serial 1 is being advertised.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Current configuration:
> > > !
> > > version 12.0
> > > service timestamps debug uptime
> > > service timestamps log uptime
> > > no service password-encryption
> > > !
> > > hostname Cisco2509
> > > !
> > > enable password router
> > > !
> > > ip subnet-zero
> > > ipx routing 0010.7be8.22f4
> > > !
> > > !
> > >  !
> > >  !
> > >  !
> > >  interface Ethernet0
> > >  ip address 12.11.12.1 255.255.255.240
> > >  no ip directed-broadcast
> > >  delay 1000
> > > !
> > > interface Serial0
> > >  ip address 172.16.18.1 255.255.255.240
> > >  no ip directed-broadcast
> > >  no ip mroute-cache
> > >  ipx network 3
> > >  no fair-queue
> > >  clockrate 1000000
> > > !
> > > interface Serial1
> > >  ip address 172.17.18.2 255.255.255.240
> > >  no ip directed-broadcast
> > >  clockrate 4000000
> > > !
> > > router igrp 1
> > >  passive-interface Ethernet0
> > >  passive-interface Serial0
> > >  passive-interface Serial1
> > >  offset-list 2 out 11000 Serial0
> > >  network 12.0.0.0
> > >  network 172.16.0.0
> > >  network 172.17.0.0
> > > !
> > > ip classless
> > > !
> > > access-list 2 deny   12.11.12.1
> > > !
> > > !
> > > !
> > > !
> > > !
> > > line con 0
> > >  transport input none
> > > line 1 8
> > > line aux 0
> > > line vty 0 4
> > >  password cisco
> > >  login
> > > !
> > > end
> > >
> > > Cisco2509#
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Cisco_4000>ping 172.17.18.1
> > >
> > > Type escape sequence to abort.
> > > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.17.18.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
> > > !!!!!
> > > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max =
120/120/124
> ms
> > > Cisco_4000>ping 12.11.12.1
> > >
> > > Type escape sequence to abort.
> > > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 12.11.12.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
> > > .....
> > > Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
> > > Cisco_4000>
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30803&t=30648
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to