Priscilla,

You MUST have been in a hurry, 0 means match this bit position and 1
means
don't care.  Definately can't argue with your second paragraph though.

Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI
Community College of Southern Nevada
Cisco Regional Networking Academy

Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:

  Have you put the addresses and masks in binary and tried to work it
  out for
  yourself? In the mask, 0 means "don't care" and 1 means "must match."

  This is a quick answer due to a shortage of time and because I think
  you
  will learn best if you do it yourself.

  Priscilla

  At 05:38 PM 1/5/02, Hunt Lee wrote:
  >Thanks for the response guys  :)  But can anyone explain to me how
  do you
  >guys derive:
  >
  >10.10.10.40 0.0.0.7 & 10.10.10.48 0.0.0.1
  >
  >And also, for the second statement, how do you know 48 has to be
  placed in
  >the fourth octet?
  >
  >I'm still very confused, but thanks for your help in advance.
  >
  >Best Regards,
  >Hunt Lee
  >
  >
  >""Gaz""  wrote in message
  >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  > > You're not wrong, spotted the previous mistake, you just missed
  off an
  > > address. That's a nice way of putting it eh?
  > >
  > > Changing your second line to Permit 10.10.10.48 0.0.0.1 will do
  the trick
  > > because it allows 48 and 49 through.
  > >
  > > Regards,
  > >
  > > Gaz
  > >
  > >
  > > ""Shengtao""  wrote in message
  > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  > > > I think "Permit 10.10.10.40 0.0.0.7" will allow 40-47, and you
  need
  > > another
  > > > statement " Permit 10.10.10.48 0.0.0.0" to allow 48 to get
  through.
  > > >
  > > > Am I worng?
  > > >
  > > >
  > > > ""Godswill HO""  wrote in message
  > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  > > > > Hi,
  > > > >
  > > > > Try the following:
  > > > >
  > > > > IP access-list standard allowed
  > > > > Permit 10.10.10.40 0.0.0.7
  > > > > Permit  10.10.10.49 0.0.0.0
  > > > >
  > > > > The first permit statement allow addresses n.n.n.40 to
  n.n.n.48,
  while
  > > the
  > > > > last one allow address n.n.n.49. There is no way you can deny
  whole
  > > range
  > > > > without affecting other addresses with one single statement.
  > > > >
  > > > > When appliying it to your interface say:
  > > > >
  > > > > Router(config-if)#IP access-group allowed in
  > > > >
  > > > > Regards.
  > > > > Oletu
  > > > >
  > > > > ----- Original Message -----
  > > > > From: Hunt Lee
  > > > > To:
  > > > > Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:29 PM
  > > > > Subject: Access-List questions [7:31001]
  > > > >
  > > > >
  > > > > > Hello there,
  > > > > >
  > > > > > I need some help on Access-Lists:
  > > > > >
  > > > > > Say if I want to permit network access to only 10.10.10.1 -
  > > 10.10.10.254
  > > > > >
  > > > > > I know you can simply use:
  > > > > >
  > > > > > Access-list 10 permit 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255
  > > > > >
  > > > > > However, if I want to only permit the range of 10.10.10.40
  to
  > > > 10.10.10.49
  > > > > > (inclusive), then what should I do?
  > > > > >
  > > > > > Any help is greatly appreciated.
  > > > > >
  > > > > > Best Regards,
  > > > > > Hunt Lee
  > > > > > IP Solution Analyst
  > > > > > Cable & Wireless
  > > > > _________________________________________________________
  > > > > Do You Yahoo!?
  > > > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
  ________________________

  Priscilla Oppenheimer
  http://www.priscilla.com
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31108&t=31001
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to