In general, you will not want to redistribute most BGP routes into your IGP. A common design is to redistribute one or two routes and to make them exterior routes in IGRP, or have your BGP speaker generate a default route for your autonomous system. When redistributing from BGP into IGP, only the routes learned using EBGP get redistributed. EBGP default administrative distance is 20 vs IGRP's 100.
Make sure you meant IGRP and not EIGRP, if it is EIGRP then run "no auto-summary" to see the subnets. Regards, Murtaza P.S.: some more info from cisco site http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/21.html ----- Original Message ----- From: "Aamer Kaleem" To: Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:10 PM Subject: IGRP Subnet mask issues [7:31349] > I have two routers. One of them is running IGRP,BGP and OSPF and other is > running IGRP only. > The network between two IGRP routers is 30 bit mask. Here is the diagram: > > IGRP/BGP/OSPF IGRP > > R1-------------------------R2 > 10.3.255.10/30 10.3.255.9/30 > > R1 has some 24 bit 10-netorks directly connected to it as well. I have > following IGRP configuration > > R1: > router igrp 1 > redistribute ospf 1 > redistribute bgp 65430 > network 10.0.0.0 > default-metric 10 100 255 255 1500 > > R2: > router igrp 1 > network 10.0.0.0 > > > 10.0.0.0/24 networks won't show up in the routing table of R2. > Could someone explain why it is happening what is the fix. > > Thank you, > Aamer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31354&t=31349 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
