Without changing the interface subnetmask to /24, break 10.0.0.0/24 to several /30 networks (10.0.0.0/30 to 10.0.0.252/30) , make a static route for each /30 network to the interface connecting 10.0.0.0/24, and redistribute those static routes to IGRP domain. This kind of solution is defined at CCO, http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/52.html I doubt that this solution will be allowed in the Lab, because the requirement of static routes.
PS: I think "ip subnet-zero" has to enable to allow 10.0.0.0 network. > considering how often and to what depth this issue has been and continues to > be discussed here and elsewhere, it shouldn't be too hard to discover the > answer. > > try changing your network on the R1-R2 link to a /24 and see what happens. > then report back your findings along with your own speculation. > > HTH > > chuck > > > ""Aamer Kaleem"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I have two routers. One of them is running IGRP,BGP and OSPF and other is > > running IGRP only. > > The network between two IGRP routers is 30 bit mask. Here is the diagram: > > > > IGRP/BGP/OSPF IGRP > > > > R1-------------------------R2 > > 10.3.255.10/30 10.3.255.9/30 > > > > R1 has some 24 bit 10-netorks directly connected to it as well. I have > > following IGRP configuration > > > > R1: > > router igrp 1 > > redistribute ospf 1 > > redistribute bgp 65430 > > network 10.0.0.0 > > default-metric 10 100 255 255 1500 > > > > R2: > > router igrp 1 > > network 10.0.0.0 > > > > > > 10.0.0.0/24 networks won't show up in the routing table of R2. > > Could someone explain why it is happening what is the fix. > > > > Thank you, > > Aamer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31365&t=31349 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
