doesn't matter.

Serial1/0                  100.100.100.1   YES manual up
up

Serial1/1                  100.100.13.1    YES manual up
up

r1#ping 10.1.1.1

Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.1.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
.!.!.
Success rate is 40 percent (2/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 20/20/20 ms
r1#ping 10.1.1.1

Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.1.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
!.!.!
Success rate is 60 percent (3/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 20/20/20 ms
r1#

as long as your side of the link is up, this is what happens

can't do further testing, as my frame setup would take too long to change. I
presume, though, that if your side of the link is down then all packets
would go out the one interface that is still up.

Chuck


""Brian Whalen""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Doesnt that depend on whether you route to the local interface or the
> remote ip?
>
> Brian "Sonic" Whalen
> Success = Preparation + Opportunity
>
>
> On Sat, 12 Jan 2002, Bill Carter wrote:
>
> > If the static routes have the save metric, the router will load balance
> > traffic it sends out according to the routes.  I don't like this option
> > because if one path goes down every other packet will fail.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > Cisco Breaker
> > Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 6:05 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Static route loacd balancing? [7:31715]
> >
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > My customer wants load balancing solution to a branch office. He heard
that
> > it can be done with static routes, but as I know load balancing can't be
> > done by deploying static routes. Any help about this? Can it be done or
how
> > effective will it be?
> >
> > Best regards,




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31756&t=31715
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to