So you are actually saying that some packets will be lost. Can we avoid this
with policy-maps or something else?

Best regards,


""Chuck Larrieu""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> doesn't matter.
>
> Serial1/0                  100.100.100.1   YES manual up
> up
>
> Serial1/1                  100.100.13.1    YES manual up
> up
>
> r1#ping 10.1.1.1
>
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.1.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
> .!.!.
> Success rate is 40 percent (2/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 20/20/20 ms
> r1#ping 10.1.1.1
>
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.1.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
> !.!.!
> Success rate is 60 percent (3/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 20/20/20 ms
> r1#
>
> as long as your side of the link is up, this is what happens
>
> can't do further testing, as my frame setup would take too long to change.
I
> presume, though, that if your side of the link is down then all packets
> would go out the one interface that is still up.
>
> Chuck
>
>
> ""Brian Whalen""  wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Doesnt that depend on whether you route to the local interface or the
> > remote ip?
> >
> > Brian "Sonic" Whalen
> > Success = Preparation + Opportunity
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 12 Jan 2002, Bill Carter wrote:
> >
> > > If the static routes have the save metric, the router will load
balance
> > > traffic it sends out according to the routes.  I don't like this
option
> > > because if one path goes down every other packet will fail.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > > Cisco Breaker
> > > Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 6:05 AM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Static route loacd balancing? [7:31715]
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > My customer wants load balancing solution to a branch office. He heard
> that
> > > it can be done with static routes, but as I know load balancing can't
be
> > > done by deploying static routes. Any help about this? Can it be done
or
> how
> > > effective will it be?
> > >
> > > Best regards,




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31828&t=31715
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to