Sorry to bring this up again but apparently, for at least some of us, it needs to be. I chimed in the other day and offered a way to get EIGRP to distribute a default route. That basically amounted to simply defining a static to 0.0.0.0 and redistributing static into EIGRP (whoever corrected me by pointing out that the 'network 0.0.0.0' command isn't necessary, I thank you (it was in BSCN)).
Wayne jumped in and explained some problems with EIGRP and the 'ip default-network' command. I thought it all sounded quite reasonable. So I tried this in the lab for several hours today (no "get a life" remarks please). I must be really dense, because nothing I try works quite the way (that I thought) it was described. It seems that the only way to sucessfully use the default-network is to configure it on every single router in the AS (I tried this with RIP just as a sanity check and it worked just fine). If that is the case, can a good argument be made in favor of this approach over redistributing static? Or summarizing to 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 on an interface? Both of those, at least, propogate throughout the AS after configuration on just one router. Thanks in advance, Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31799&t=31799 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
