Mmmm... I've just spent half the day getting ambiguous command for "wr m".
Can't get it out of my system now - old dogs/new tricks.

Gaz

""Chuck Larrieu""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> OK, so I've been doing rack testing for some people who are going to be
> going public Real Soon Now.
>
> Got some things mocked up. Some of which relate to topics discussed on
this
> forum yesterday and today. I need to check something and issue the command
> "show ip prot" enter.
>
> r2#sh ip prot
> % Ambiguous command:  "sh ip prot"
> r2#
>
> well, now...
>
> r2#show ip prot?
> protocol-discovery  protocols
>
> r2#show ip prot
>
> so what is "show ip protocol-discovery?
>
> r2#sh ip protocol-discovery ?
>   interface  Show for a specific interface
>   protocol   Show stats about a pariticula protocol
>   stats      Show Stats
>   top-n      Show Top-N protocols by bytes
>   |          Output modifiers
>
>
> OK. so a command I've been using since 11.2 is no longer valid. except
that
> it is on other routers.
>
> but look - still good on other routers:
>
> r3#sh ip prot?
> protocols
>
> r3#sh ip prot
>
>
> OK, check CCO, no record of any such command as show ip protocol-discovery
> in any command reference I check. A search of CCO for the phrase reveals
> nothing.
>
> now what?
>
> the IOS version in question is:
>
> r2#sh ver
> Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
> IOS (tm) 3600 Software (C3620-JS56I-M), Version 12.1(5)T10,  RELEASE
> SOFTWARE (f
> c2)
>
> sigh. have not run into this before, not in two trips through the lab, not
> on any number of routers and IOS versions, both at home and in customer
> installations.
>
> Anyone got any clue what show IP protocol-discovery does?
>
> sheesh.. another good shortcut down the tubes.
>
> Chuck




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31903&t=31817
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to