well, this has been an interesting search. finally got something that
appears to work.

For those whose rack rental places continue to expect you to configure the
lightstream as well as the router side of things, something like this
appears to work.

ATM1 atm pvc a b interface atm 2 c d

ATM2  no configuration required

so in the particular pod where I am working:

interface ATM0/0/0
 no ip address
 no ip directed-broadcast
 atm ilmi-keepalive
!
interface ATM0/0/2
 no ip address
 no ip directed-broadcast
 atm ilmi-keepalive
 atm pvc 1 52  interface  ATM0/0/0 1 50
!

note that ATM 0/0/0 has no pvc configuration

test with:

ls1010#sh atm vc
Interface    VPI   VCI   Type    X-Interface  X-VPI X-VCI  Encap Status
ATM0/0/0     1     50     PVC     ATM0/0/2     1     52           UP
ATM0/0/2     1     52     PVC     ATM0/0/0     1     50           UP

now I have end to end ( assuming the router side is configured correctly )

interesting. time wasting.

Chuck


""Chuck Larrieu""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Anyone have some sample Lightstream 1010 configs they can send me
privately?
> for configuring the LS so that ATM edge routers can route over ATM?
>
> Yes I have checked CCO and the doc CD. I could spend a good portion of my
> life studying how to set up a Lightstream so that ATM routers ( 36xx and
> 72xx ) can route across ATM, or I can rely on the good will of some of you
> folks.
>
> Hint to rack rental places: ATM core switch configuration is NOT part of
the
> CCIE R/S competency. The LS is NOT on the equipment list for the R/S Lab,
> and neither I nor anyone else I know has been required to configure an LS
in
> the Lab. I rent your rack time so I can practice the required competencies
> ( of which there are MANY ) Same for frame, BTW.
>
> thanks.
>
> Chuck




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31917&t=31758
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to