Have you checked the utilization on those 2650's?  I'd bet it's never gotten
above 15%.  The 2650's can handle a lot more than 1 t-1's worth of traffic.

-Ejay

-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 12:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Internet Router? [7:33639]


The 3640 will work for you.  I would definitely max out the RAM.  Some
others have commented about not needing full BGP route tables.  My customers
have been very happy with partial tables as described in the following CCO
link.  I have also had customers use 2 2650's, 1 T-1 per connection box,
HSRP on the Ethernet port and run IBGP between each other for optimal
routing.  I then configured them with the below link.

http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/459/41.shtml

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Scott Nawalaniec
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Internet Router? [7:33639]


Hello Everybody,

I just want to run this by everyone for their input from experience.

Scenario:
I'm looking for a Cisco router that will be providing Internet connectivity
running BGP and that will be able to handle the capacity of 2 PTP T1's to
the Internet. I know minimum RAM will have to be 64mbs for BGP routes. I
just want to know what people have tried that does and doesn't work.

My choice would be a 3640 for future T1 expandability and/or a HSSI port.

Thank you for the input.

Scott




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33743&t=33639
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to