I'll post [what I think are] relevant parts of my config: #ip set interface sc0 1 10.2.16.2 255.255.255.248 10.2.16.7
set interface sc0 up set interface sl0 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.255 set interface sl0 down set arp agingtime 1200 set ip redirect enable set ip unreachable enable set ip fragmentation enable set ip route 0.0.0.0 10.2.16.1 1 set ip alias default 0.0.0.0 Aside from this, I am running a stock configuration (I erased the previous startup-config.). I'm running CatOS 4.5(12). 1. I can ping the default gateway and the default gateway can ping the sc0 interface back. 2. I can ping other interfaces on the default gateway (default gateway is 10.2.16.1, and I can ping 10.1.1.1, which is another int on the router) 3. Can't reach external subnets from the Cat5k sc0 interface, and vice versa. 4. Routing is ok-- I swapped out the catalyst with a laptop, mirroring the IP config. Laptop was able to reach external subnets. 5. The sc0 interface is part of vlan 1 by default, I can't change this with the CatOS version I have. I configured the default gateway's port to be part of vlan 1 as using ISL. Results the same as before (can ping the gateway, but nothing else) One of Catalyst gurus must know what I'm doing wrong! :) - Sean -----Original Message----- From: Fraasch James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 8:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Catalyst 5000 not being routed [7:34566] Any chance you could submit the configs? Might make it easier to troubleshoot for people over here. It sounds as if you are not using the RSM on the 5000 at all which means that all you really need to have is the default route set on the switch and that the port on the router needs to be configured correctly. You may want to double check your OSPF settings as well. If the Cat5000 is on a different network altogether than the rest of your routers, of course it will not route to that network (IE, your network is 172.25.0.0 but this 5000 is on 172.26.0.0 and your OSPF statement reads network 172.25.0.0 0.0.255.255 then of course the Cat5000 would not be in the tables). I have done that before. Like I said, configs would be great if possible. James Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34686&t=34566 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
