I always thought that it was: life's a bitch, and then you marry
one................

or in my case - a couple.   :-(

Off to the lab Mr. Johnson.  Share your number with us when you get back.

Kevin Wigle

----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Larrieu" 
To: 
Sent: Friday, 08 February, 2002 19:29
Subject: Re: comments on Cisco PIX CSPFA exam [7:34922]


> as someone wiser than I once put it, life's a bitch, and then you die.
>
> sorry to hear your bad luck. another time....
>
> Chuck
>
>
> ""mike johnson""  wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Hi All,
> > I took the Cisco PIX CSPFA exam yesterday and I was
> > suprised to find out that my score is 970/1000.  I've
> > never worked with any type of firewalls let alone PIX
> > Firewall.  I read the CSPFA book and borrowed the
> > materials from a friend of mine who went to global
> > knowledge training a few weeks earlier.  I am very
> > disappointed with the exam.  I don't think anyone like
> >
> > myself should be able to pass the exam that easily.
> >
> > I thought yesterday's test score was a fluke so this
> > morning I went and took the MCNS exam and I got a
> > score
> > of 960/1000.  I was completely shocked.  A few hours,
> > I
> > decide to sign up for the CCIE written exam.
> > Amazingly
> > I passed with a score of 92/100  That is unbelievable.
> > To pass the exam for someone like myself really
> > de-value the prestige of Cisco Certification by some
> > bookworms like me.  Cisco, after all, should make the
> > exam a lot harder than the way it is now.
> >
> > Anyone care to comment on this.
> >
> > Mike Johnson
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings!
> > http://greetings.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34931&t=34922
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to