Unless I'm reading your question totally wrong, that one address will only cover 1 link between 2 sites, .1 and .2. I have to imagine I'm reading it wrong.
""Tom Richs"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > If you have lets say 4 WAN sites or 3 WAN sites connecting as a triangle, > does it make sense to use one network lets say 192.168.5.0/30 as the > subnetted ip address for all the WAN serial interfaces between all the > sites. > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: > http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35418&t=35405 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]