Unless I'm reading your question totally wrong, that one address will only
cover 1 link between 2 sites, .1 and .2.  I have to imagine I'm reading it
wrong.


""Tom Richs""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> If you have lets say 4 WAN sites or 3 WAN sites connecting as a triangle,
> does it make sense to use one network lets say 192.168.5.0/30 as the
> subnetted ip address for all the WAN serial interfaces between all the
> sites.
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
> http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35418&t=35405
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to