There are circumstances when WFQ and CBWFQ are used on high speed interfaces, specially in diffserv QoS environment.
Nadeem ====== s vermill wrote: > All, > > Would you be so kind as to share your thoughts/experience with WFQ on high > speed links? I know that Cisco generally considers it to be unnecessary on > links greater than 2 Mbps. > > I have a client with a 16 Mbps HSSI connection between 3640 routers. The > config has been in place for a long time. However, the circuit does not > seem to support the throughput that they should be getting. I finally got > them to share a copy of the config file. Not only is WFQ enabled, but the > congestive discard value was left at a default 64 messages. > > I am wondering if this is just unnecessary or if it is/can be detrimental? > As I said, there are indications that there are throughput issues. > > Please note that I am just looking for comments. Unfortunately, I have > never had my hands on any of their equipment (yet). Thus, I have no debug > or even visual observations to offer. All of my information is third > party. Just trying to understand the wisdom of using WFQ in this environment. > > Many thanks, > > Scott -- ==================== Ishrat Nadeem Zahid CCNP Cisco Systems,Inc. Chelmsford, MA 01824 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35653&t=34913 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
