Boson exam #1 - 200+ questions
Boson exam #2 - 200+ questions
Boson exam #3 - 400+ questions

--- Denni

-----Original Message-----
From: Gobble Degook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: written exam passed [7:33460]


lots of people ask the same thing already

test 1,2,3 has 200Q,200Q,400Q respectively. so totally
800Q. 

gobble

--- JimYam  wrote:
> Gobble,
> 
> May I know which Boson 800Q you are refering to?
> I believe they have Boson 1, 2 and 3.
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> Jim
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: ""gobble degook"" 
> Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco
> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 12:54 PM
> Subject: written exam passed [7:33460]
> 
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > I passed written this morning with 90, mixed
> feelings.
> >
> > Cisco should really change exam content, honestly
> speaking, only 5
> questions
> > I have never seen before. maybe cisco should sue
> boson, even the ospf area
> > number on the diagram is the same. on the other
> side , I think I am lucky
> > becos I am still under the old content.
> >
> > My suggestion: if they still have this old
> content, just do boson 800
> > questions, then you can pass easily.
> >
> > My preparation: after CCDP, read jeff doyle once,
> ospf sections are
> > excellent. out of patience before I start to read
> caslow and halabi. did
> > boson 800Q, ccprep 200Q. make sure you understand
> each question and
> > knowledge required behind.
> >
> > Can anybody advise me whether I violate NDA by
> saying these things. it is
> > definitely not my intention to do that.
> >
> > Gobble
> > ccnp/dp, mcse, cne, sun csa&cna.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >


______________________________________________________________________ 
Find, Connect, Date! http://personals.yahoo.ca




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36537&t=33460
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to