I maen 1:5 ratio

--

RFC 1149 Compliant.


""Steven A. Ridder""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> In a few months you won't have to.  they are removing token ring from lab
> exam as they already did with x.25, appletalk, LAT, etc..  I heard it
> directly from William Parkhurst, the program manager for the CCIE program.
> He also said that there will be some new certifications within the ccie
> program for people who do wonderful things, such as one guy who has 4
> different CCIE qualifications, first time passers, etc.  Also, there will
be
> a CCIE advisory board, where CCIE's can give inputto the future of the
> program, etc..  Also the plaque is comming back.
>
> I also asked him about the "lab-rat" situation and what he thought of it.
> He said that he's not worried because there still is indirect
> troubleshooting on the lab and being a CCIE dosen't mean you know
everything
> about networking, just that you are at a very high level.  if you can
> accomplish the lab, then no matter how you got there, congratulations and
> pat yourself on the back.
>
> Finally, here is a passing stat for the CCIE as far as I can tell (from
the
> numbers I have received).
>
> Approx 50,000 people have attempted lab, and approx. 9000 have passed.
> That's an approx 17:1 ratio of people who take exam to people who ever
pass
> in their lifetime.  Pass rate is still secret.
>
> --
>
> RFC 1149 Compliant.
>
>
> ""Mckenzie Bill""  wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > O.k.
> >
> > Let me re phrase my question.  How important is it to know how to
conevert
> > the RD into hexidecimal? I have the RII and the RIF but then a couple of
> > papers I read stated, and now the easy part...the RD, and then I'm lost.
> >
> > Any help?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37430&t=37401
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to