they're also "thinking" of letting third parties proctor the lab, so people can get there easier. The only problem is not losing control of the LAB and keeping standards high. Also more real wold scenarios, updated technologies will be in the lab.
-- RFC 1149 Compliant. ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > He never gave a date and he's gone now. He said real soon though and I > beleive it only covers the lab. Cisco still expects a CCIE to be able to > support token-ring, but not implement it. Same as all the other legacy > technologies. > > -- > > RFC 1149 Compliant. > > > ""Kaminski, Shawn G"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Bummer.............just kidding:-) > > > > Can you get the CCIE program manager to narrow down what "soon" means? :-) > > > > Shawn K. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:44 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: CCIE program will be dropping token ring! [7:37422] > > > > > > I'm in a meeting with the CCIE program manager and they will be removing > > Token-ring soon! > > > > -- > > > > RFC 1149 Compliant. > > > > > > ""Scott H."" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Not that bad. A bunch of dates open in March and April in San > > > Jose--if > > you > > > can't do that, you are screwed until August. The one thing that I > > > have noticed is that when people get within their 28 day window, they > > > drop > > their > > > date. This opens up dates for the more serious contenders. > > > > > > Best of luck! > > > Scott > > > > > > ""AMR"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > What's the wait time like nowadays? > > > > > > > > -A Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37452&t=37422 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
