quite possibly because the big telecom providers
connect most of their pops/CO's with high speed
atm links...


Larry Letterman
Cisco Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Patrick Ramsey
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 12:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VLoFR and atm popularity [7:38003]


Cisco support vlan tagging over frame circuits?

I was looking at a Tierra networks router and it was listed as one of it
+'s.

Does Cisco even support this?  This kinda creeps up even further on the +'s
of atm and how long atm is going to survive.

Other than being capable of joining elans at oen fac. from another, can
anyone even think of why atm still exists?  With wdm and all the newer
technology coming around the corner, why is atm still so saught after for
long distance links?

-Patrick


>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Confidentiality Disclaimer   <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and
/or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System,
Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom
addressed.  This email may contain information that is held to be
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or
copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may
subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this
email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this
email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you.

================================================================




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=38015&t=38003
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to