Do you think I need a couple for my home lab? The largest I've worked with are oc-3's.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Bernico" To: "Mike Mandulak" ; Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 12:24 AM Subject: RE: VLoFR and atm popularity [7:38003] > Heh, for only about $240,000 list you too can own a 1 port oc-192 POS card for a 124xx series GSR that will do not only PPP and HDLC over sonet, but also frame relay encapsulation... > > Seriously though, we aren't ready for 10Gig yet, but when the time comes I'm considering using 10 Gig E between our core routers instead. I'm not sure how serious I am about that, but the line cards will be less than half the cost. Anyone other SPs out there considering that? > > Mike > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Mandulak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tue 3/12/2002 5:14 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: > Subject: Re: VLoFR and atm popularity [7:38003] > > > > Out of curiosity, what hardware/protocol do you use for an OC-192? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mike Bernico" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 5:28 PM > Subject: RE: VLoFR and atm popularity [7:38003] > > > > I work for a large ISP. As far as I'm concerned there is no such thing as > a > > high speed ATM link. In the cisco carrier class ATM world oc-12 is as fast > > as you go. Unless of course you use the mgx 8850, the biggest piece of > junk > > ever painted blue and stamped with a bridge. ATM is still a great way to > do > > statistical multiplexing, a great revenue stream for carriers and popular > > among the "connect all the sites in my enterprise together with DS3s > > crowd." ATM circuit emulation is darn handy for legacy video. It's days > > are numbered in larger networks. It's all but extinct in the > OC-12 > > networks, but it's going to be around for a while for smaller networks. > > > > > > Mike > > ------------------- > > Mike Bernico [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Illinois Century Network http://www.illinois.net > > (217) 557-6555 > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Larry Letterman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 3:00 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: RE: VLoFR and atm popularity [7:38003] > > > > > > > > > quite possibly because the big telecom providers > > > connect most of their pops/CO's with high speed > > > atm links... > > > > > > > > > Larry Letterman > > > Cisco Systems > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > > Patrick Ramsey > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 12:25 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: VLoFR and atm popularity [7:38003] > > > > > > > > > Cisco support vlan tagging over frame circuits? > > > > > > I was looking at a Tierra networks router and it was listed > > > as one of it > > > +'s. > > > > > > Does Cisco even support this? This kinda creeps up even > > > further on the +'s > > > of atm and how long atm is going to survive. > > > > > > Other than being capable of joining elans at oen fac. from > > > another, can > > > anyone even think of why atm still exists? With wdm and all the newer > > > technology coming around the corner, why is atm still so > > > saught after for > > > long distance links? > > > > > > -Patrick > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Confidentiality Disclaimer This email and any files > > transmitted with it may contain > > > confidential and > > > /or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar > > > Health System, > > > Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or > > > entity to whom > > > addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be > > > privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under > > > applicable law. If > > > the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you > > > are hereby > > > notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or > > > copying of any information from this email is strictly > > > prohibited, and may > > > subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have > > > received this > > > email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and > > > then delete this > > > email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you. > > > > > > ================================================================ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=38074&t=38003 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
