after some recent bad experiences with VPN across DSL, I began to wonder about MTU sizes and their effect, particularly when coupled with off the wall links or protocols.
OTOH, it could be that your VPN boxes don't like the latency across the sat links. maybe you have your ak timeouts set too low, and the boxes are spending all their time renegotiating links rather than sending data? BTW, how are you measuring speeds? Ping tests? File transfers? ""Jerry Deer"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > To make our vpn connection work the satellite/isp provider had to open > certain ports to make our vpn connections work in the first place . does > anyone have any ideas as to what they may have blocked or not configured > correctly to make the connection so unbearable slow? I know our watchgaurd > sohos will bring connection speed down some but we have 128k vpns that are > running a lot faster then this satellite connection and as i mentioned > before the satellite connection shows connections speeds of avg 700k before > adding the vpn units. > Thanks for ANY help, > Jerry > > > > > > Hello All , I am having problems running over a " fast " satellite > > connection. I do a speed test from the pc hooked to the satellite > equipment > > and the actual satellite connection is getting average 700k BUT as soon as > a > > slap on the ol watchgaurd vpn solution it and hook a computer to that the > > speed drops to below a 56k I know this is not a cisco problem but > watchgaurd > > support is very lacking in my humble opinion and was hoping someone may > have > > had simular experience and could point me in right direction. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=38080&t=38080 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
