I found my previous administrator configured the following NAT for my router
(shown below). Our network is in 50.100.X.X and we need to contact a
workstation in 192.168.3.X network (192.168.3.1-192.168.3.100). That's why
he defined the source pool to be from 192.168.3.101 192.168.3.240
  
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
interface Ethernet0
 description Interface facing Financial Service Provider
 ip address 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.0
 ip nat outside

interface Ethernet1
 description Interface facing Rabobank (Trusted) network
 ip address 50.100.165.240 255.255.255.0
 ip nat inside

ip nat pool XXY 192.168.3.101 192.168.3.240 netmask 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside source list 1 pool XXY

##########################################################################

Q1)But, when I show IP nat trans. I saw the following, I understand the
first two, but not line 3.  the 192.168.3.118 should be the source address
of returning packet, what is 192.168.3.119 ? 

RBFW2514#sh ip nat trans
Inside global         Inside local          Outside local    Outside global
--- 192.168.3.117      50.100.165.81         ---                   ---
--- 192.168.3.118      50.100.165.210        ---                   ---
--- 192.168.3.119      192.168.3.118
############################################################################

Q2)I understand there is another kind of NAT which work like the following.
Inside global         Inside local          Outside local    Outside global
192.168.2.2:1234      10.0.0.1:1234                          172.21.3.1:23
192.168.2.2:2222      10.0.0.2:2222                          172.21.3.2:23
192.168.2.2:3333      10.0.0.3:3333                          172.21.3.4:23

What is the difference these method.  I think both NAT can work.  Why we
don't use these one?

Q3)But in this method, I found a problem what if 10.0.0.1 and 10.0.0.2 use
the same port 2222.  There will be 2X 192.168.2.2:2222 in the inside global.
Will be 192.168.2.2:2222 have problem identify which to be NAT back to
10.0.0.1 or 10.0.0.2.

Thanks a lot
Tong






==================================================================
De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en 
is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht 
onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en 
de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. 
==================================================================
The information contained in this message may be confidential 
and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you 
receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents 
herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail.


==================================================================




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=38764&t=38764
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to