I think a lot of us use e-mail to participate in this discussion group. We work in a stateless, connectionless mode. It was the only method available at first, I think. I never bothered to check out any other methods.
Your response is incomprehensible to us. We don't have a clue what you're talking about. We just see your one message with no context. At 06:22 PM 3/28/02, Chris Charlebois wrote: >OK, so at least 3/4 of the response to this question say the exact same >thing. Or at least hint at it. (It doesn't make sense to me to take the >time to answers someones question and do it with 2 words. "vlans" while >correct is not, by itself, an answer.) My point is the redundancy. Do >some people not read the upt-teen responses before jumping out with their >own? Or do some people access these via some other transport (i.e. e-mail) >and so don't see the responses? Or do some people just like seeing their >names on a newsgroup? It just doesn't make sense. ________________________ Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39860&t=39788 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
