Hi,

The one which you mentioned is not the right one,

A simple technique to get the Inverse mask  is as

1.From you example let say you want to aggregate 192.168.1.10 to
192.168.1.15,First of all aggregate this addresses and find the summarized
mask.
The summarized mask in this case is 192.168.8/29 (ie 255.255.255.248)

2.To get the inverse mask subtract 255.255.255.248 from 255.255.255.255
which comes out 0.0.0.7

3.The result is 192.168.1.8 0.0.0.7


Kind Regards /Thangavel
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CCIE (qual),CCS,CCDP,CCNP,MCSE
------------------------------------------------------------------------
186K
Reading,Brkshire
Direct No   -0118 9064259
Mobile No  -07796292416
Post code: RG16LH
www.186k.co.uk

----------------------------------------------------------------------
The greatest glory in living lies not in never falling,
     but in rising every time we fall ."
 -- Nelson Mandela

--------------------------------------------------------------------


                                                                                       
                       
                    "r
Paul"
                              
cc:
                    Sent by:             Fax
to:
                    nobody@groups        Subject:     Help with extended
access lists [7:40904]
                   
tudy.com
                                                                                       
                       
                                                                                       
                       
                   
09/04/2002
                   
10:12
                   
Please
                    respond to
"r
                   
Paul"
                                                                                       
                       
                                                                                       
                       




Hello wondered if anyone can explain.

I have extended access lists working fine.

I have a few blocks of ip address I want to add to list and they are not
all
consequtive. What I want to do is use the minimum entry to cover each
block.
i.e

Say I had several like this 192.168.1.10 to 15 etc etc

I want to make a single entry for every consequtive block. I do not own the
whole range or subnet. Can I do something like this.

access list 101 permit tcp 192.168.1.10 0.0.0.6 193.26.1.52 eq www

What I am wanting to clarify is if I have the wildard bit right. In above
example was hoping that 0.0.0.6 would be 6 addresses (192.168.1.10 to
15)...have I understood this right?. do not want to match whole subnet with
0.0.0.255 but that is the only other examples I have seen.

Many thanks

Paul
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is from 186k Ltd and is intended only for the 
addressee named above. As this e-mail may contain confidential
or priveleged information, if you are not the named addressee or
the person responsible for delivering the message to the named 
addressee, please advise the sender by return e-mail. The
contents should not be disclosed to any other person nor copies
taken.
186k Ltd is a Lattice Group company, registered in England 
& Wales No. 3751494 Registered Office 130 Jermyn Street 
London SW1Y 4UR
**********************************************************************




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40905&t=40904
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to