Hi Thangavel, agreed, but Mohammad is looking for a cheap solution. If he uses VLAN interfaces to put the servers on, e.g. each server on a different VLAN, policy routing will still work fine. The problem with the processing overhead remains...;)
Regards, Georg >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: "Georg Pauwen" >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: content based switching?? [7:40990] >Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 11:23:42 +0100 > > >Hi, > >Just to add some more info , policy routing cannot dominate the entire path >from source to destination.It can only influence the path upto the next >hop.And also it is not advisable to enable policy routing on the core >networking devices as they add more processing ovehead. > >Kind Regards /Thangavel > >186K >Reading,Brkshire >Direct No -0118 9064259 >Mobile No -07796292416 >Post code: RG16LH >www.186k.co.uk > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >The greatest glory in living lies not in never falling, > but in rising every time we fall ." > -- Nelson Mandela > >-------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > "Georg > Pauwen" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > il.com> Fax to: > Sent by: Subject: RE: content based >switching?? [7:40990] > nobody@groups > tudy.com > > > 10/04/2002 > 11:07 > Please > respond to > "Georg > Pauwen" > > > > > > >Hi Muhammad, > >I would say that policy routing is probably your cheapest way to go. With >policy routing, you can define which traffic goes to which destination. I >am >not sure how familiar you are with policy routing, but have a look at the >following link: > >http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/techno/protocol/tech/plicy_wp.htm > >If you have specific questions about the syntax, just reply to this post. > >Regards, > >Georg >********************************************************************** >This e-mail is from 186k Ltd and is intended only for the >addressee named above. As this e-mail may contain confidential >or priveleged information, if you are not the named addressee or >the person responsible for delivering the message to the named >addressee, please advise the sender by return e-mail. The >contents should not be disclosed to any other person nor copies >taken. >186k Ltd is a Lattice Group company, registered in England >& Wales No. 3751494 Registered Office 130 Jermyn Street >London SW1Y 4UR >********************************************************************** > _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41016&t=40990 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
