that looks odd, but I noticed different in the 2 configs was this: 1) Frame encapsulation was different (one was default, i.e. cisco, the other was ietf (I Eat ToFu)) making it look like at different times, there were different vendors routers across the link.
2) the bandwidth, which makes it look like (to me) that the link has ben upgraded. My deduction: when the line was upgraded and the equipment was switched, somebody left the old config on one subif and put the new config on another. Probably so if things crashed, they had something to fall back on. Of course, I could be totally wrong. :-) --Tim Nuurul Basar Mohd Baki wrote: > > Hai, > > I've recived a config that contain a sound like HSRP on a > single router. > The function is for Serial 0 to back up Serial 1 and vice versa. > I am unable to see how does it works :( > Can some help me on this > > > Interface serial1/1 > bandwidth 128 > no ip addres > encaps fr > fr lmi-type ansi > > interface serial1/1.2 point-to-point > bandwidth 64 > ip address *.*.*.89 255.255.255.252 > no arp fr > fr interface-dlci 21 > > ! > > interface serial 1/2 > bandwidth 128 > no ip address > ecnaps fr ietf > fr lmi-type ansi > > interface serial 1/2.8 point-to-point > badwidth 64 > ip address *.*.*.89 255.255.255.252 > fr interface-dlci 21 > > ! > > * The link is not having any load balancing configured on it. > * If serial 0 is down all route will be auto rerouted to S1 > > Question: > > 1) How those this works ?, since both subinterface is having > the same ip > address. > 2) From the branch site, how do they chose the correct route?. > 3) Can this be define as HSRP ? > > I hope that some one can help me on this matters. > > Thanks > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41025&t=40995 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
