I don4t think OSPF v.1 ever went into production. More like a pure authentication issue.
Phil. --- "Steven A. Ridder" wrote: > Could one be ospf v. 1? > > Or could one be doing PT auth and the other MD5? > > ""STRAND Scott"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I had a problem between two OSPF neighbors. Here > is what I saw in the log: > > > > OSPF-4_ERRRCV Received invalid packet: BAD Version > > OSPF - Mismatch Authentication key - Message > Digest Key 1 > > > > My question is what is meant by "Bad Version". > Anyone seen this. > > > > Tks, > > Scott > > > > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type > application/x-pkcs7-signature > > which had a name of smime.p7s] [EMAIL PROTECTED] __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41284&t=41195 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
