Classfull routing protocol does not advertise and address mask with the advertise destination address, which means that it assumes a defaul mask for the three major address IP classes A,B,C. Classless on the other hand does advertise the mask, which means that it will advertise the mask along with the destination address, RIP version 2 is the case, great for subneting, VLSM.
Jorge Matt Saunders wrote: > Hi Group, > > Im really struggling to understand the requirement in using the ip classless > command when you are configuring a default route. > > I noticed that RIP 2 is a classless protocol & RIP ver 1 is a classfull. > > Can anyone help me understand what the difference is (in simple terms!!) as > i want to move on with my studies though im sure this is something thats > going to come up again!!!! > > Cheers > > Matt Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41574&t=41574 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
