For those of us that work for NSPs/ISPs or some other form of provider functionality, what are the thoughts in regards to use of public address space within VPNs?
I've seen several networks that are using public address space within their VPNs, hence preventing the use of that space on the net. Several clients have large netblocks routing in their VPNs rather than renumbering to RFC 1918 address space. To me, this seems like a horrible waste of address space. I'd tend to think that it would be the provider's responsibility to strongly encourage the clients to relinquish their public space if all traffic is to remain in the VPN. Using NAT to allow Internet access as required. Also, I thought I had heard (perhaps just a rumor) that ARIN or some other similar authority watches for use of address space. In other words, if someone's been assigned a /16 and no hosts of that /16 are publicly visible, a 'nasty-gram' would arrive questioning the lack of use. Sorry for the off-topic thread but since I've seen several people post questions about building VPNs, I was hoping to see some discussion on the matter. -chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42362&t=42362 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
