Did you put maximum-paths 2 under your rip config? JR -- Johnny Routin The "Routin" One
""Ted Siniscalchi"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I've been trying to set up RIP load balancing, and although I have two > equal-cost paths, "show ip route" only shows one of the paths. When I > "debug ip packets", I notice the the "len" parameter's value is different > for the two serial links to the target network. The output looks like this: > > IP: s=192.168.3.2 (Ethernet0), d=10.0.0.1 (Serial1), g=192.168.2.1, len 72 > ... > > IP: s=192.168.3.2 (Ethernet0), d=10.0.0.1 (Serial1), g=192.168.1.1, len 52 > ... > > As you can see, the "len" vlaue is different for the two paths. I should > note that the target Ethernet network runs between a 2621 and a 2514. > > My questions are what is the "len" parameter? Is the difference in the > values responsible for my inablility to load-balance? And can the len be > modified? > > Thanks in advance for any light you can shed on this. I've searched the > archives and the Cisco site, but I've been unable to find anything directly > on point. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42924&t=42909 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
