I forgot, another thing I noticed is that I was told how many answers to
choose. For example, on every question I was asked to "Select the best
answer" or "Select the two best answers", etc. I remember the 350-001 didn't
tell you how many answers to choose.

Shawn K.

P.S. I also noticed that in my previous post I wrote "Cisco ISO" when I
meant "Cisco IOS". Fat finger!

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael L. Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CCIE Written Beta [7:43164]


Interesting.....  As far as the "back" button goes, here's what I
remember..... Back when, all of the Cisco exams had the back button...
(someone correct me, but the CCIE was around before CCNA/NP, etc).....  At
some point (around the time I started taking Cisco exams) they removed the
use of the back button from the Cisco Career Certs (CCNA/DA, CCNP/DP exams)
because they realized that some of the questions would give away answers
that could have been asked in previous questions....  but they left the back
button in the 350-001.  AFAIK, they never removed use of the back button for
the CCIE written.... but I am surprised that they didn't remove it in the
new incarnation.....

Good info ... I'm s'posed to take the beta tomorrow.....   I know MPLS is
going to be probably my biggest weak point as I haven't read hardly anything
about it.... but the rest I may have a good chance at doing alright at......
Wish me luck!  (pleeze.... pleeze wish me luck... LOL)

Mike W.

"Kaminski, Shawn G"  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> What I found interesting about this exam was that I was able to go 
> back to previous questions. I can't remember if the 350-001 was like 
> that. I
wonder
> if all the Cisco beta exams are like that? Another interesting thing 
> was that they had commands on this test that probably have been used 
> only once in the history of networking, and that one and only time was 
> on this exam
> :-) !!!! I thought it was a good test to make people realize that anything
> in the Cisco ISO is fair game on the one-day lab.
>
> Shawn K.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Daniel Lafraia [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 4:28 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: CCIE Written Beta [7:43164]
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I just took the new CCIE Written Beta test. That's really a very 
> > hard
test
> > (everything that we've been hearing about this test is true ). You 
> > have 180 minutes (I've used 179 minutes and a few seconds! YES, 
> > that's full 3 hours without going to the bathroom ) for 150 
> > questions. It really seems that everything in networking is covered 
> > in this test. From some basic
> > questions to the most complex questions about IPX, MPLS, VLAN, BGP,
OSPF,
> > EIGRP, DLSw+, ATM, LANE, NAT, Queueing (all WFQ, RSVP, Traffic 
> > Shaping
and
> > Load Balancing), VoIP, Frame Relay, ISDN, Token Ring, EtherChannels,
IPSec
> > and everything else you can think.
> >
> > I didn't get any "type the command" type of question, altough you 
> > may
find
> > some questions like "what's the command that likely would fix this 
> > problem". Basically more than 60% of these questions have its own 
> > lab scenario.
> >
> > For those who will take this test: Even though that's the new format 
> > (351-001), you really should take a look at the blueprint for the
> > (350-001)
> > before taking this test
> >
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/rsblueprint.html
> >
> > I've used Boson tests CCIE practice test #2, Caslow's book, Routing
TCP/IP
> > volume I and II, Halabi's book and a lot of reserch on cisco.com :)
> >
> > Well. I hope this helps! :) Now I have to wait 6-8 weeks for the 
> > result
:)
> >
> > cya
> > Daniel Lafraia




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43228&t=43164
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to