Check out: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fibm _r1/br1fprt2/br1fdlsw.htm#xtocid6
" Each remote peer has a single list number associated with it; therefore, if you want traffic to go to a bridge group and to either a ring list or port list, you should specify the same list number in each definition. " Chris ""William Lijewski"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I have two questions about DLSW + that I could use some explainations for. > I would greatly appreciate any feedback you may have. > > 1) When you are doing DLSW Lite across the Frame Relay why is it necessary > to map the LLC2 across the frame when you are not using passthrough? I can > undertand it when you do specify the passthrough command, but without it I'm > kind of confused? (is it because there is no other mode of transport across > the frame since its encapsulating it in the frame packets) > > 2) Here is one that you will probably never get, but there are a couple of > us trying to figure this one out and can't find any documentation on it. > Okay, say you have the following lists set up for DLSW: > > dlsw ring-list 1 rings 1 2 > dlsw port-list 1 s0 > dlsw bgroup-list 1 bgroups 1 3 > > and then you do a command: > > dlsw remote-peer 1 tcp 1.1.1.1 > > Which list does it actually apply to the remote peer? Does it apply all of > them? The 1st one? Anyone know for sure? > > Thanks and sorry for the rather long post. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43337&t=43041 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
