What's the reason? I'm not disputing the fact, just wondering what the limitation is. I take it that the limitation is only that it cannot do stateful failover with two active PIXes?
Cheers, Gaz wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Yeah, I asked the same questions last month. They can not. If you really > need firewall and Load balancing, FW-1 is the way to go. > > Theo > CSS1, CCNP, CCSE > > > > > > > "Patrick" > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 05/06/2002 06:28 AM > Please respond to "Patrick" > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc: > Subject: Re: Pix load balance? [7:42974] > > > No. > > ""GEORGE"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Can you load balance to pix firewalls? > > Has anyone done this? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43478&t=42974 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
