The Cisco CSS11xxx can do NAT without degrading performance. I have had
excellent experiences setting this up for clients.
-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Zeitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tue 5/7/2002 12:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: RE: Pix load balance? [7:42974]
Dumb question, does any of these devices use nat? I just read that pix
to DMZ interface uses dNat, not sure if that is faster. I was reading my
Alteon Web Switch book last night, it says you CAN do nat, but I don't
know if layer 4-7 switches actually DO nat normall. If it's a switch, it
should be switching right, the translation gets done in layer 4. kinda
confused.....
-----Original Message-----
From: Gragido, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 12:09 PM
To: Brian Zeitz; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Pix load balance? [7:42974]
The best way to load balance is to use an application layer (layer 4-7)
switch. I am not too familiar with Cisco's offering of this technology
(sadly), but have worked extensively with Foundry's ServerIrons and they
are
excellent devices!
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Brian Zeitz
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 8:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Pix load balance? [7:42974]
Load balancing is supposed to be done on content switches according to
what I am reading. I cannot be done on the firewall withing the site,
nor can it be done with different ISPs.
Brian Zeitz MCSE, CCNP
-----Original Message-----
From: Gaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 6:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pix load balance? [7:42974]
What's the reason?
I'm not disputing the fact, just wondering what the limitation is. I
take it
that the limitation is only that it cannot do stateful failover with two
active PIXes?
Cheers,
Gaz
wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Yeah, I asked the same questions last month. They can not. If you
really
> need firewall and Load balancing, FW-1 is the way to go.
>
> Theo
> CSS1, CCNP, CCSE
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Patrick"
> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 05/06/2002 06:28 AM
> Please respond to "Patrick"
>
>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cc:
> Subject: Re: Pix load balance? [7:42974]
>
>
> No.
>
> ""GEORGE"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Can you load balance to pix firewalls?
> > Has anyone done this?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43534&t=42974
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
