Yeah, someone else busted me down on my comment. I checked with my friend, and he had a 1720, not a 1750, and it wasn't new, so your observation about the difference between the -0 and the -1 models may be what tripped me up.
Sincerely, John Dorffler CCIE #6677 ""s vermill"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > John Dorffler wrote: > > > > The FE interfaces that support VLAN trunking all use a chipset > > that supports > > trunking. Not all router models and not all modules that have > > 100Mbps > > interfaces use the required chipset. The best way to determine > > whether a > > router or module supports trunking is to read the release notes > > for the > > hardware. There is always a grid that lists the versions of IOS > > that are > > supported on that hardware along with the individual features > > that each > > version supports. Its a little tedious, but it can help prevent > > buying > > hardware that doesn't do what you assume it should do. I > > recently checked on > > the 1700 series and the 2620/2621 and discovered that the > > 172x/175x does NOT > > support trunking while the 262x does. I am not sure about the > > new rack-mount > > 1760s. > > I have several 1720s that do not support trunking but I understand that the > new 1721 does. > > It is also rumored (urban legend?) that there are one or > > two 10Mb > > interfaces on some router/module that supports trunking. I > > wouldn't attempt > > that in a production environment, but in a study lab it would > > be cool. > > > > My $0.02, > > John Dorffler > > CCIE #6677 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45261&t=45152 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
