chaps,,

many thanks for everyone`s input...
it has been extremly insightful./.....

in answer to howards question....

the problem i ma tying to solve is this...


i wish to effectly (as much as i can )...load balance whilst keeping my
redundency to a full ...

i want to take the most advantage of my E3`s coming into my UK pop...

i had not even considered multi-homing to the same ISP (via different
POP`s)..

any comments as to the best way to achive this....i

I am getting lots of VFM ( Value For Money) request from the directors....

and i wont to know i am doing as much as is possible to give them that...


again many thanks


steve

----- Original Message -----
From: "dre" 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:52 PM
Subject: Re: BGP addressing..i think i understand but i am not sure
[7:45278]


> ""Peter van Oene""  wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > I'm not sure where to point you.  All I can tell you is that it is
> > commonplace and likely will continue to be so.  I'm currently not aware
of
> > any routing issues that this behavior would induce.
> ""Howard C. Berkowitz""  wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > I'm not sure I could point you to anything more specific than the
> > IDR, NANOG, and RIPE routing group archives.  I hadn't noticed this
> > desire of the RSNG; the impression I have was the inconsistent routes
> > to be reported were those who were NOT registered in the IRR.  Such
> > unregistered routes are far more likely to be due to error.
> >
> > RFC 1930, while a wonderful document certainly worth reading by any
> > CCIE candidate, is informational rather than standards-track.
>
> Ahem.
> http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0110/lixia.html
>
> I know of many instances where this has been used to hijack traffic.
> It's not just a rumor, this is real.  AS3847 used to participate in such
> overbearing rediculous practices (for fun and profit).
>
> Announcing inconsistent routes can also have many operational benefits.
> Most of the "why" is included in the NANOG presentation, but not
> necesarily the "how".
>
> -dre




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45353&t=45353
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to