What matterials do you mean by 29.95$?

Hamid
""Kaminski, Shawn G""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> You spent $80.00 on Boson tests when you could have gotten materials that
> cover the exact same topics for $29.95? Shame on you!
>
> Congrats!
>
> Shawn K.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Pierre-Alex Guanel [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:46 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: CCIE Written passed - Boson  [7:45535]
> >
> > I took the CCIE written yesterday afternoon and passed (80%)
> >
> > I was expecting more, but I flunked the performance/QoS section of the
> > exam,
> > which I neglected somewhat during preparation.
> >
> > I used both Boson #1 and Boson #3. Those 2 tests are complementary and
are
> > NOT substitute for each other. Boson #3 focuses on SNA issues where as
> > Boson
> > #1 focuses on the other networking topics.
> > If you can, you should purchase both tests.
> >
> > For preparation I did a pre-test on Boson #3 and discovered how little
SNA
> > and ATM I knew. For 3 weeks, I studied SNA and ATM using CCO + hands-on
> > until the whole thing felt natural. Then, on the 4th week of preparation
I
> > repeated the same strategy with Boson #1. I dicovered 3 areas of
> > networking
> > where I had some weaknesses. I only had time to work on 2 of them
> > thoroughly
> > before the test.
> >
> > Thank you to Bernard and Dennis for excellent test materials and to all
> > those who gracefully took the time to answer my questions. I
particularly
> > want to thank Priscilla and Leigh Anne who both put me back on track
> > several
> > times during the last two years and Daniel Cotts for squeezing some time
> > out
> > of his busy schedule to spend some time discussing Cisco with me.
> >
> >
> > Pierre-Alex




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45542&t=45535
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to