You did an illegal command. First, 25% is reserved for the router, for routing updates, protocol overhead, etc. You can change that with the max-reserved-band command.
Now, as for yuor command, you put 100% of the link for the 4 classes, then tried to give 24k to the voice class. If you gave a minimum of 100% to the classes, how can there be any left for the priority queue? -- RFC 1149 Compliant. ""Ednilson Rosa"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi Folks! > > I'm configuring QoS for a large network and I have some doubts about > Policy-maps. I configured this policy: > > policy-map QoS > class voice > priority 24 > class very-high > bandwidth percent 10 > class high > bandwidth percent 20 > class medium > bandwidth percent 30 > class low > bandwidth percent 40 > class class-default > fair-queue > random-detect > > As you can see, I gave 24 Kbps for voice packets with the "priority" > command. There are four other classes to which I gave 10, 20, 30 and 40 > percent of the bandwidth. I also have a default class, that will match > packets not matching the other classes. > > My question is: how much of the bandwidth will be reserved for each class?? > Someone told me that 25% of the bandwidth is automatically reserved to the > class-default, but I couldn't find this on any document. Is that correct?? > If yes, and assuming that I4m talking about a 64 Kbps link, then I would > have 16 Kbps (25% of 64Kbps) to the class-default, 24 Kbps to the voice > class and 24 Kbps to be divided through the 4 other classes by the > "bandwidth percent" command, which would give me 2.4Kbps, 4.8Kbps, 7.2Kbps > and 9.6Kbps. Is that correct??? > > I'll appreciate any help! > > Thanks!! > > Ednilson Rosa Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46136&t=46127 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
