Look at the new 1700's (I think it's called 1760 or 1761) - they've got a 1U rack form factor.
I haven't laid hands on one yet but it looks promising. It's only got one 10/100 Ethernet built-in but you can add a 10mb Ethernet via a WIC. Obviously you'd need another WIC for the serial I don't know how much punishment the CPU on these routers can take - thinking about QoS, Firewall, IPsec, NAT, etc. Anyone work on one of these yet? -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Kaberna Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 4:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: which is the best Router for the following tasks [7:46288] 2611 if you want Ethernet and 2621 if you want Fast Ethernet. I generally don't like to work with anything under a 2600. You can also look at the 1751. The problem with the 17XX series is they aren't rack mountable. ""Fab Perez"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi news > > I need to pickup a Router with the following features: > _ 2 Ethernets > _ 1 V.35 Serial / Sync > _ QoS > _ Load Balancing (EIGRP ?) > _ NAT > _ Firewall > > Thanks in advance. > > -- > Fab Perez > .net .admin > www.inet.co.cr > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46398&t=46288 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
