We have one we are beta testing some stuff with. I really like the fact that it has an internal PS and you can rack mount it. Other than that and an additional VIC slot it's not much differant than a 1751.
Dave "R. Benjamin Kessler" wrote: > > Look at the new 1700's (I think it's called 1760 or 1761) - they've got > a 1U rack form factor. > > I haven't laid hands on one yet but it looks promising. > > It's only got one 10/100 Ethernet built-in but you can add a 10mb > Ethernet via a WIC. > > Obviously you'd need another WIC for the serial > > I don't know how much punishment the CPU on these routers can take - > thinking about QoS, Firewall, IPsec, NAT, etc. Anyone work on one of > these yet? > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > John Kaberna > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 4:43 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: which is the best Router for the following tasks [7:46288] > > 2611 if you want Ethernet and 2621 if you want Fast Ethernet. I > generally > don't like to work with anything under a 2600. You can also look at the > 1751. The problem with the 17XX series is they aren't rack mountable. > > ""Fab Perez"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi news > > > > I need to pickup a Router with the following features: > > _ 2 Ethernets > > _ 1 V.35 Serial / Sync > > _ QoS > > _ Load Balancing (EIGRP ?) > > _ NAT > > _ Firewall > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > -- > > Fab Perez > > .net .admin > > www.inet.co.cr > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46451&t=46288 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]