We have one we are beta testing some stuff with.  I really like the
fact that it has an internal PS and you can rack mount it.  Other than
that and an additional VIC slot it's not much differant than a 1751.

  Dave

"R. Benjamin Kessler" wrote:
> 
> Look at the new 1700's (I think it's called 1760 or 1761) - they've got
> a 1U rack form factor.
> 
> I haven't laid hands on one yet but it looks promising.
> 
> It's only got one 10/100 Ethernet built-in but you can add a 10mb
> Ethernet via a WIC.
> 
> Obviously you'd need another WIC for the serial
> 
> I don't know how much punishment the CPU on these routers can take -
> thinking about QoS, Firewall, IPsec, NAT, etc.  Anyone work on one of
> these yet?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> John Kaberna
> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 4:43 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: which is the best Router for the following tasks [7:46288]
> 
> 2611 if you want Ethernet and 2621 if you want Fast Ethernet.  I
> generally
> don't like to work with anything under a 2600.  You can also look at the
> 1751.  The problem with the 17XX series is they aren't rack mountable.
> 
> ""Fab Perez""  wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Hi news
> >
> > I need to pickup a Router with the following features:
> > _ 2 Ethernets
> > _ 1 V.35 Serial / Sync
> > _ QoS
> > _ Load Balancing (EIGRP ?)
> > _ NAT
> > _ Firewall
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > --
> > Fab Perez
> > .net .admin
> > www.inet.co.cr
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
David Madland
Sr. Network Engineer
CCIE# 2016
Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
612-664-3367

"Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46451&t=46288
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to