May I take a stab at this? Please correct me if I am wrong in concept or understanding.
Static routes are not advertised. They appear only in the routing table of the local router. Therefore "classful" and "classless" do not apply. When you redistribute a static route into a routing protocol, then it depends upon the nature of that protocol. I don't have any routers to practice on, but I would surmise that if you were to redistribute a VLSM static route into RIP, for example, that the advertisement would be at the classful boundary. Please correct me where necessary. Reg ""mlh"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > In other words, the advertisement of static routes are accompanied by the > corresponding subnet masks? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47224&t=47223 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
