Hi, Reg, thank you for your clarification. static routes are the local routing information, so won't be advertised.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Reg Dwight" To: Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2002 12:29 AM Subject: Re: Is static routing classful or classless? [7:47223] > May I take a stab at this? Please correct me if I am wrong in concept or > understanding. > > Static routes are not advertised. They appear only in the routing table of > the local router. Therefore "classful" and "classless" do not apply. > > When you redistribute a static route into a routing protocol, then it > depends upon the nature of that protocol. I don't have any routers to > practice on, but I would surmise that if you were to redistribute a VLSM > static route into RIP, for example, that the advertisement would be at the > classful boundary. > > Please correct me where necessary. > > Reg > > > > ""mlh"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > In other words, the advertisement of static routes are accompanied by the > > corresponding subnet masks? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47275&t=47223 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
