>Howard, > >Do you have URL for a terminology document on IS-IS that is similar to >the BGP and OSPF drafts?
There isn't any yet for IS-IS, although I think Manral and Russ are thinking about doing one. > >You also mention that there are methodology and applicability drafts >for BGP and OSPF. What about IS-IS? Do you think these would be good >background material for the CCIE qualifying exam? The BGP might or might not, but we consciously tried to make a number of concepts clearer than they are in RFC1771, which deal with where a BGP implementation puts selected or candidate routes, how routes get packed into updates, etc. It's not vendor-specific, although Cisco is participating. I'd have to think about the OSPF, as it's under more intense discussion. In many ways, it's harder to model the convergence time of an IGP than BGP. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48295&t=48271 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
