My guess is that you have a 7505 rather than a 7005 (no such animal). A 7505
has "7500 Series on the back (non-interface side) and 7505 on a sticker by
the power cord. The good news is that it accepts newer RSP cards.
I did compare a RSP2 to a RSP7000 and found that the connectors are
different. As well, there are metal tabs on the back of the cards. They have
a keyway that prevents them from being seated into the wrong slot. The RSP2
and RSP7000 have different keyways.
So in answer to the original question - the way to upgrade a 7010 to run IOS
greater than 11.2 is to acquire the RSP7000 & RSP7000CI card set.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrick Bass [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 7:00 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Cisco 7010 router help [7:47893]
> 
> 
> I just checked I'm using an RSP2 in a 7005.  Does that help?
> 
> 
> ""Daniel Cotts""  wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Let me start with what is documented and then ask if anyone 
> is doing it
> > differently.
> > First off the 7010 is a five slot chassis. It originally 
> shipped with a
> > route processor (RP), and a switch processor (SP). Later 
> versions had a
> > silicon switch processor (SSP).
> > The 7000 is from the same family as the 7010. It has seven 
> slots. Again it
> > used the RP and SP/SSP pair.
> > As previously posted, the IOS updates for the RP ended at 11.2.
> > When Cisco introduced the 7500 series it created an upgrade for the
> existing
> > 7000/7010 boxes. That was the RSP7000 / RSP7000CI set of 
> cards. Note that
> > the routing function and the switching function moved to 
> one card. See:
> >
> http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/core/cis7000/r
> outeswi/25617r
> > sp.htm
> > Some are available. Often the RSP7000CI board, which 
> contains all of the
> > environmental monitoring functions is missing. I doubt that 
> is an issue
> for
> > lab use.
> > The RSP7000 runs current IOS.
> >
> > The 7500 series replaced the 7010 with the 7505. The 7000 
> became the 7507.
> > IIRC The 7505 shipped with an RSP1 card, the 7507 had an RSP2.
> > Patrick's post sent me to CCO. The 7505 does support the 
> RSP1, RSP2, RSP4,
> > and RSP8. See the following:
> >
> http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/core/cis7505/r
> te_swit/index.
> > htm
> >
> > The 7000s had the CX buss, the 7500s the CY buss. Interface 
> cards designed
> > for the CX buss will work in the 7500s (with some 
> exceptions. Usually
> > resolved with a later version of the card.)
> >
> > I have not looked at the connectors on the rear of an 
> RSP7000 vs an RSP2
> or
> > RSP4. My guess is that they are different because of the 
> different busses.
> > Anyone know? Anyone use an RSP2 in a 7000? If so, my 
> prayers are answered.
> > If not, anyone have a RSP7000 set at a reasonable price?
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Patrick Bass [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:43 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: Cisco 7010 router help [7:47893]
> > >
> > >
> > > I've got RSP7000/7500 version 12.1.15 ent/fw/ids/56 version,
> > > 16f/64r, the
> > > filename is rsp-jo3sv56i-mz.121-15.bin... you need a cco
> > > account to get it,
> > > and i suppose a cco account with the right privs.  In any 
> event, I'm
> > > guessing it will work on a 7010.  i'm using a 7005 with an rsp2...
> > >
> > >
> > > ""Kazan, Naim""  wrote in message
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > This is off the topic but can you help me with what version
> > > of IOS is
> > > > support by the 7010 router. I was told before end of sale
> > > of 7010 router,
> > > > the highest ios version was 11.0. Is that correct or can I
> > > DL 12.0 version
> > > > to 7010 router. The router is for home lab use only.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48317&t=47893
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to