Hi again, I am sorry for mixing up. Yes, I assumed nat command and static is indeed a NAT.
Regards, Ufuk. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of B|lent ^ahin Sent: 12 Temmuz 2002 Cuma 13:49 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: PIX without NAT. [7:48593] Hi, I think there is misunderstanding about NAT. I used NAT as Network Address Translation, not the command. According to my knowledge the static command is used for Network Address Translation and with the command "static (inside,outside) 10.10.10.2 10.10.10.2 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0", an address translantion definition from "10.10.10.2" to "10.10.10.2" can be created. Bulent Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48672&t=48593 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
