Just had something come up with a customer along these lines. Your provider may or may not do MPPP with customers. I believe SBCIS, for example, will not do it no way no how. So first thing, check with your provider as to what they are willing to do.
Per packet load share on the 26xx platform may not perform very well. The customer I referred to complained to me that their network performance was LOTS faster with a single T1 than with per packet load share across 2 T-1s ( this is a frame network, and I don't recall the CIR's or other factors. No I did not design it. Someone else did. Now I have to fix it :- wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > We are upgrading to 2 T1's to our provider, Fractional DS3 is prohibitively > expensive in our rural area. > Has anyone done any speed comparisons on using round robin style static > routes > (i.e. 2 default routes w/ same cost) versus EIGRP's load balanceing versus > running MLPPP on the Serial interfaces? We're currently using a 2621 but are > open to "bigger" routers. > > > > Kevin Hunt > CCNP, MCSE, MCT, Linux+ SME Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49056&t=49039 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
