Hi Kevin, We were in the same scenario in which you have described. The way I choose to do is keep it simple and efficient and cost effective. We have dual PTP connections on a Cisco 2650 with CEF, default routes, and per packet load sharing. I can max out the t1's and it barely taxes the router resources and on top of this I have about a 20 line access control list filtering traffic. =) This router is a workhorse and I'm in love it. The 2650 uses a faster memory and cpu than the 2621 but I think the 2621 would work.
Hope this helps you in some way, Scott -----Original Message----- From: W. Kevin Hunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 2 T1's to our provider [7:49039] We are upgrading to 2 T1's to our provider, Fractional DS3 is prohibitively expensive in our rural area. Has anyone done any speed comparisons on using round robin style static routes (i.e. 2 default routes w/ same cost) versus EIGRP's load balanceing versus running MLPPP on the Serial interfaces? We're currently using a 2621 but are open to "bigger" routers. Kevin Hunt CCNP, MCSE, MCT, Linux+ SME Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49065&t=49039 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
